One of the most common discussion topics on the minds of HR leaders today is Organizational Design. Businesses are constantly seeking to transform themselves to enable scalability and operational efficiency while remaining nimble and focused.
Organizational design is a critical component of creating an agile organization. It can also determine whether an organization operates efficiently or not, as well as whether the organization is flexible enough to adapt to changing needs.
Fundamentally, organizational design is optimizing the structure of the organization to achieve its goals including reporting lines, spans of control, layers of hierarchy, locations of work, centralization vs. decentralization, and many other factors. But simply moving boxes on a whiteboard will not improve organization performance.
Recently I have seen an increased focus on organizational design. Clients have been asking how they can optimize the design of their organization to attack a range of goals from efficiency to better addressing global market opportunities.
The focus makes sense.
Organizations are trying to focus on their mission and on growth while determining the “right” staffing levels in a challenging employment market. They are looking at alternatives around contingent staffing, outsourcing, partnering, and changing organization structure to try to help ensure that they do not stay on the cycle of staff up and lay off.
But just as importantly, companies have realized that for nearly two decades they have made a lot of organizational changes without thinking through the best way to staff the organization – too often decisions have been made in response to surplus or scarcity. Because of this, many organizations are starting to see the symptoms and impacts of poor organization design, including:
This focus on organizational design has illustrated a number of workforce planning issues. One of the most prominent issues is around staffing and productivity. And frankly, I believe that this is an issue that is going to continue to manifest itself. What organizations have found is that the staffing cuts over time have created an organizational design that is not sustainable. The levels of productivity required to achieve the organization’s goals are not sustainable.
Many organizations have pushed too much work onto managers, often taking the idea of a “producing manager” too far. This has begun to manifest itself in a number of ways ranging from increased stress and turnover among managers to a loss of focus on the “management” role (vs. the “producer” role) and consequently turnover issues among staff. In some cases, this dynamic has been seen among individual contributors as well.
There are a number of organization design issues that companies encounter that can lead to these types of impacts.
All of these prevent organizations from learning and increasing innovation, agility, and adaptability. Unfortunately, too many organizations attempt to adjust structure in an informal and undisciplined way (what I call “moving boxes around”).
Anyone can draw a new org chart. What is much harder is ensuring that the new organization actually achieves the goals it is established for and fixes the problems that it is supposed to fix.
But just as important, the structure needs flexibility and adaptability to an ever-changing environment. To address that, organizations need to undertake a disciplined process that not only addresses structure but systematically addresses all of what comes before and after structure, including (but not limited to):
In a future post, I will dive more deeply into the process for organizational design.
Organizational design can be a critical component of driving competitive advantage in an organization, but just as important, it can be essential to ensuring that an organization can actually achieve its mission.
To do it well, there must be a disciplined and comprehensive process that not only addresses structure but also ensures that all other key factors are aligned to make sure that the structure truly delivers on its promises.
Attracting and securing top talent remains a formidable challenge in the competitive landscape of business growth. This article addresses essential talent acquisition and recruitment strategies that are crucial for modern hiring success. Effective talent acquisition strategies are vital for aligning hires with an organization's vision and culture. Utilizing these strategies involves leveraging technology and diversity for a strategic advantage. Read on for actionable insights and tactics that will empower your…
Over the past few years, Landrum Talent Solutions’ clients have noted growing pressure to balance day-to-day HR management responsibilities with the tasks of finding, vetting, and onboarding new team members. Busy HR professionals often struggle to find the right fit, especially if the role is complicated or high-level. That makes the time-consuming and ever-challenging tasks involved in hiring new HR team members doubly difficult. A Society for Human Resource Management…
Headcount planning is a critical component in achieving business success, yet it presents a challenge in balancing workforce requirements with financial constraints. Headcount planning, the strategic alignment of staff numbers and skills with organizational goals, is essential for operational efficiency and budget management. HR, finance, and business leaders must collaborate to forecast needs and maintain agility. Read on to discover actionable strategies and best practices that will guide you in…
From new technology to complex reporting to ever-changing regulations – keeping pace with today’s HR functions can be overwhelming. However, a few key skills are perennially sought after, and the most effective HR practitioners use them daily. Since HR is the primary connection between a business and its employees, having HR professionals with these crucial skills goes a long way to ensuring smooth operations, happy teams, and overall business success.…
